Loading study pack…
Loading study pack…
Loading topic preview…
6 building blocks · blurt the topic, then mark it block by block against the answer key.
Topic preview
Preview the first part of the topic. Unlock SQE2 Playbook to answer prompts, get marked against the answer key, repair gaps, and carry the topic into review.
6 of 6 shown
Paragraph 9 alleges that Delta Storage Ltd failed to provide any warehouse access on 3 June. Delta's electronic log shows access from 09.02 to 17.11 that day. Draft a compliant defence response giving the reason and Delta's positive case without exhibiting the log.
Paragraph 4 alleges that the defendant signed a contract on 6 April for GBP 75,000 and guaranteed completion by 30 April. The defendant admits the contract and price but says the signed document contains no guaranteed date. Draft a clear partial admission and denial.
A claimant pleads that its retailer cancelled three downstream orders after receiving the defendant's components. The defendant was not party to those orders and has no records confirming them. Draft the appropriate defence response without asserting that the cancellations did not happen.
The claimant seeks GBP 16,800 for replacement hire at GBP 400 per day for 42 days. The defendant admits that 14 days at GBP 250 per day would have been reasonable but disputes the rest. Draft the defence quantum paragraph.
A simple contract claim alleges breach on 12 May 2019 and the claim form was issued on 20 May 2026. No postponement or acknowledgment is alleged. Draft the material core of the defendant's limitation plea without adding evidence.
A claimant pleads that Northfield Repairs Ltd agreed to overhaul a machine for GBP 28,000 by 1 August, returned it on 4 August in an unsafe condition and caused GBP 9,600 hire loss. Northfield admits the contract and price, says the agreed completion date was varied in writing to 4 August, denies unsafe workmanship and cannot verify the claimant's hire agreement. Draft three defence paragraphs that cleanly separate the admission, positive variation case, workmanship denial and genuine non-admission.
New to the method? See why Paper Tiger beats rereading