Loading study pack…
Loading study pack…
Loading topic preview…
7 building blocks · blurt the topic, then mark it block by block against the answer key.
Topic preview
Preview the first part of the topic. Unlock SQE2 Playbook to answer prompts, get marked against the answer key, repair gaps, and carry the topic into review.
6 of 7 shown
At Elena Ward's first hearing for an either-way employee-theft charge, the defence anticipates a not-guilty plea and seeks summary trial. Explain the plea-indication sequence, when allocation occurs, what follows if magistrates accept jurisdiction, and when Elena may elect Crown Court trial; also distinguish the route after a guilty indication.
Defending Elena Ward on allocation of an alleged GBP 7,500 workplace theft, counsel relies on three witnesses, a short spreadsheet and no expert evidence. The prosecution stresses breach of trust. Apply the Allocation guideline: identify the two routes that may justify Crown Court trial and explain why the statutory maximum or serious label alone is insufficient.
Over four months Elena Ward allegedly diverted GBP 7,500; the defence says another employee used the shared account and identifies her early admissions and repayment offer as mitigation only. At allocation, show how each side should address likely sentence without resolving credibility, assuming guilt or conducting a premature sentencing exercise.
Prosecuting Ravi Shah for an either-way conspiracy allegation, counsel relies on encrypted chats across two phones and evidence from an alleged insider. The defence says the exhibits are searchable and only three witnesses are required. Explain what concrete trial-management complication must be shown before calling the case unusually complex, and why importance alone is not enough.
The magistrates tell the prosecution that Elena Ward's workplace-theft trial appears manageable and any excessive sentence can be dealt with by committal after conviction. Reply for the prosecution by acknowledging that power, separating sentence from trial suitability, and explaining whether the evidence presents unusual factual or procedural complexity requiring Crown Court trial now.
Closing Elena Ward's allocation hearing, defence counsel maintains that the case is suitable for summary trial. State the exact decision requested; then explain what the court should record if it accepts jurisdiction, Elena's subsequent election, and what follows instead if jurisdiction is declined or the case is sent for trial.
The full topic unlocks with SQE2 Playbook, including the remaining prompts and answer-key marking.
New to the method? See why Paper Tiger beats rereading