Loading study pack…
Loading study pack…
Loading topic preview…
7 building blocks · blurt the topic, then mark it block by block against the answer key.
Topic preview
Preview the first part of the topic. Unlock SQE2 Playbook to answer prompts, get marked against the answer key, repair gaps, and carry the topic into review.
6 of 7 shown
Opening a defendant's bail-variation application, counsel represents Ana Malik and seeks removal of a night-time curfew so she can take a verified warehouse shift. The prosecution says the curfew protects attendance. How should counsel identify the role, hearing, precise outcome and decisive issue before giving the court a short roadmap?
For Ana Malik's bail-variation application, the defence must first show a material change before the court decides whether a night-time curfew remains necessary. The prosecution relies on attendance risk. Frame the legal route so the court hears who bears the burden, the threshold question, the remaining discretion and the decision it must make.
Ana Malik seeks removal of a bail curfew to work verified night shifts. She has lived at the same address for six years and has attended every hearing. Acting for Ana, turn those two facts into a proposition about stability, an inference about her incentive and ability to attend, and a conclusion on the alleged failure-to-surrender risk.
Eighteen months before Ana Malik's curfew application, she missed a police appointment; since then she has attended every hearing and appointment. The prosecution says that history still matters. For the defence, identify the point fairly, make a bounded concession and explain why the earlier failure does not decide the current attendance-risk assessment.
During Ana Malik's application to remove a bail curfew for verified night work, the judge asks, 'Why should I risk her missing court for the sake of a new job?' Answer for the defence immediately, give one evidence-based reason tied to attendance risk, and signpost the return to the application structure.
At the end of Ana Malik's bail-variation hearing, the defence seeks removal of her night-time curfew so she can work. If the court is not with that request, a later curfew and employer-confirmed shifts are available. Formulate the exact primary outcome, lawful fallback, practical terms and a review mechanism if employment changes.
The full topic unlocks with SQE2 Playbook, including the remaining prompts and answer-key marking.
New to the method? See why Paper Tiger beats rereading