SQE1 Playbook
Best for complete SQE1 prep. Includes FLK1 and FLK2.
£59
View SQE1 PlaybookLoading study pack…
Loading study pack…
Loading study pack…
SQE1 Playbook
Recall practice for the complete SQE1 route — answer-key marking, a focused repair for the most important gap, and a review queue that brings the relevant step or topic back when due.
January 2027 SQE1
The £59 complete Playbook includes both FLK1 and FLK2. Choose a £35 focused Playbook only if you need one assessment half.
Best for complete SQE1 prep. Includes FLK1 and FLK2.
£59
View SQE1 PlaybookFocused route for FLK1 only.
£35
Focused route for FLK2 only.
£35
View FLK2 PlaybookEach topic breaks into small, recallable building blocks. Open any subject to preview its topics — and try blurting one.
The essentials at a glance. Open any question for more detail.
Scope and included use
Voice transcription and grading are included throughout your edition for personal, non-automated study use, subject to proportionate fair-use safeguards against automated, shared or abusive use and to protect security and service availability.
Includes guided marking for normal study use; very high usage may be limited.
Edition updates
This edition is kept aligned with the syllabus, law and practice for January 2027 SQE1. Updates are included until the examinable law and practice cut-off on 11 September 2026.
Payment and access
One-time payment for access to SQE1 Playbook — January 2027. This edition is for January 2027 SQE1, and access runs through the final day of that assessment window on 22 January 2027. No recurring charge. The price shown is the total amount payable. No VAT is charged.
The amount actually paid is allocated 50% to the digital study content and 50% to the associated online services. Any discount is shared in the same proportions; if a total cannot be divided exactly, the extra penny is allocated to the services.
Checkout and privacy
Checkout is provided by Stripe. Stripe receives the details needed to take payment; Paper Tiger receives the purchase status, not your full card number. Privacy detailsCancellations and support
The digital-content cancellation right ends once immediate supply begins. The online-services part remains cancellable for 14 days; the service refund is the services price less a time-based charge for service supplied before cancellation. Faulty or misdescribed content and services remain covered by statutory rights. Questions, cancellations or complaints: hello@paper-tiger.co.uk · see the Terms for cancellation and refunds.
Buy the pack to mark every block against the answer key, or try one full topic free.
Voice transcription and grading are included throughout your edition for personal, non-automated study use, subject to proportionate fair-use safeguards against automated, shared or abusive use and to protect security and service availability.
Checkout is provided by Stripe. Stripe receives the details needed to take payment; Paper Tiger receives the purchase status, not your full card number. Privacy detailsOpen a topic, read its short primer, answer one building block from memory, then use the recorded result and review history to schedule the relevant return task.
Pack workspace preview · Tort
Guided recall
Build the topic in smaller answers before attempting the full Mastery Check.
Known or knowable co-worker risk
Step 2 of 7
In a claim that an employer failed to provide competent staff, why is a single incident of co-worker violence or bullying usually not enough to show breach unless the employer knew or ought to have known of the risk posed by that co-worker?
This issue appears when the immediate harm is done by one worker to another, but the real negligence question is whether the employer failed in its own duty to run the workforce safely.
01
Answer-key marking
See what you got right and the precise point to repair.
02
Targeted repair
Fix the gap without repeating everything you already know.
03
Spaced return
The relevant step or topic comes back in Review when it is due.
Building block · Contract formation
What you said — use this when reading the feedback below.
The court assesses formation objectively from the parties' words and conduct1. It must identify an offer and acceptance before considering remedies2, then check consideration, intention and certainty. Here, 'probably', 'around GBP10' and board approval all point away from a final offer, while 'agreed in principle' may not be final acceptance. But the retailer spent money preparing for delivery, so it should still be able to recover contractual damages if formation fails3.
Progress and review timing are based on this result.
You handled the formation analysis in the right order and identified the uncertainty signals. Tighten only the final consequence of finding no contract.
Polish, not repair — the substance is in place.
“it should still be able to recover contractual damages if formation fails” is too broad. If there is no contract, contractual expectation damages are unavailable; any alternative claim would need its own legal basis.
Formation is assessed objectively, and the conditional, approximate language plus the need for board approval point away from a final offer; ‘agreed in principle’ is unlikely to be an unqualified acceptance. Consideration and commercial intention do not cure that lack of certainty and commitment. If formation fails, the retailer's main contractual risk is that it cannot claim contractual expectation damages merely because it incurred preparatory expenditure.
Why does the retailer's preparatory spending not itself create a right to contractual damages?
Try to recall it first, then reveal to check yourself.
Paper Tiger mixes new guided work with due recall and repairs, so Today tells you what to do next instead of leaving you with a static content library.
The schedule
Your schedule and roadmap. Future days adapt as you study.
Viewing
Capable readiness by 3 Oct · 45 min/day
Today, Review and Plan follow this study plan and its schedule.
Plan status
Tort · All subjects
At your current schedule, you’ll finish around 26 Sept.
Future days are forecasts that adapt as you study.
2h 7m planned · Mostly new guided
Pressure Low
2 repair · 2 recall · 3 new guided · 1 synthesis · 2 mastery
Future days assume earlier planned work is completed.
Today15 Jul
Committed plan10m planned · Repair focus
Today’s remaining work
Repair & recall
10m · 1 task
Repair: Known or knowable co-worker risk
In a claim that an employer failed to provide competent staff, why is a single incident of co-worker violence or bullying usually not enough to show breach unless the employer knew or ought to have known of the risk posed by that co-worker?
Scheduled today · Tort · 10 min
An earlier answer showed a gap in this building block.
Next up
Repair: Known or knowable co-worker risk
In a claim that an employer failed to provide competent staff, why is a single incident of co-worker violence or bullying usually not enough to show breach unless the employer knew or ought to have known of the risk posed by that co-worker?
Scheduled today · Tort · 10 min
An earlier answer showed a gap in this building block.
Next task: Known or knowable co-worker risk
Your blurt