Loading study packs…
Loading study packs…
Loading subject preview…
Loading topic preview…
7 building blocks · blurt the topic, then mark it block by block against the answer key.
Topic preview
Preview the first part of the topic. Unlock SQE1 FLK2 Playbook to answer prompts, get marked against the answer key, repair gaps, and carry the topic into review.
6 of 7 shown
When will the court infer knowledge and approval, rather than needing separate proof beyond due execution and capacity?
What combination of capacity, knowledge of contents, and personal execution usually supports an inference of knowledge and approval?
What facts count as suspicious circumstances, especially if a beneficiary helped prepare the will?
Where suspicious circumstances surround the preparation of a will, who must prove that the testator knew and approved its contents, and to what standard in practical terms?
Why can a beneficiary’s role in preparing the will create a knowledge-and-approval problem even if the testator signed it?
How would you analyse a will where the testator had capacity, signed it personally, but did not read it and the main beneficiary arranged the drafting?
The full topic unlocks with SQE1 FLK2 Playbook, including the remaining prompts and answer-key marking.
New to the method? See why Paper Tiger beats rereading